monopoly

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and utahsyardsale.com my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and very funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to broaden his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative purposes ought to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public data from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.