1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
barryw53460113 edited this page 2025-02-03 23:02:29 +08:00


For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to expand his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for trademarketclassifieds.com a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator bahnreise-wiki.de attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' content on the web to help establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.